Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Next Page  48 / 68 Previous Page
Information
Show Menu
Next Page 48 / 68 Previous Page
Page Background

יולי 5102

- 48 -

מקורות

Ambady, N. & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-

1.

analysis. Psychological bulletin, 111(2), 256.

‏

Barber, A.E., Hollenbeck, J.R., Tower, S.L. & Phillips, J.M. (1994). The effects of interview focus on recruitment effectiveness:

2.

A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 886.

‏

Campion, M.A., Palmer, D.K. & Campion, J.E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology,

3.

‏.207-556 ,)3(05

Chapman, G.B. & Johnson, E.J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. Heuristics and

4.

biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 120-138.

‏

Dana, J., Dawes, R. & Peterson, N. (2013). Belief in the unstructured interview: The persistence of an illusion. Judgment and

5.

Decision Making, 8(5), 512-520.

DeVaul, R.A., Jervey, F., Chappell, J.A., Caver, P., Short, B. & O’Keefe, S. (1987). Medical school performance of initially

6.

rejected students. JAMA, 257(1), 47-51.

‏

Dipboye, R.L. (1997). Structured selection interviews: Why do they work? Why are they underutilized? In N. Anderson & P.

7.

Herriott (eds). International Handbook of Selection and Assessment. London: J Wiley, pp. 455-474.

Enright, M.K., & Gitomer, D. (1989). Toward a description of successful graduate students. ETS Research Report Series,

8.

1989(1), i-37.

‏

Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational

9.

Psychology, 1(3), 333-342.

‏

Huffcutt, A.I. & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.

10.

Hunter, J.E. &Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological bulletin, 96(1), 72.

11.

‏

Judge, T.A., Cable, D.M., & Higgins, C.A. (2001). The employment interview: A review of recent research and recommendations

12.

for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 383-406.

‏

King, D.W., Beehr, T.A. & King, L.A. (1986). Doctoral student selection in one professional psychology program. Journal of

13.

clinical psychology, 42(2), 399-407.

‏

Kuncel, N.R., Hezlett, S.A., & Ones, D.S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate

14.

record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 162.

‏

Lievens, F. & De Paepe, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of interviewer‐related factors that discourage the use of high

15.

structure interviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 29-46.

Owen, J. (2008). The nature of confirmatory strategies in the initial assessment process. Journal of Mental Health Counseling,

16.

30(4), 362-374.

Owen, J., Quirk, K. & Rodolfa, E. (2014). Selecting Graduate Students: Doctoral Program and Internship Admissions. The

17.

Oxford Handbook of Education and Training in Professional Psychology, 237.

‏

Parmley, M.C. (2006). The effects of the confirmation bias on diagnostic decision making (Doctoral dissertation, Drexel

18.

University).

‏

Salgado, J.F. & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview.

19.

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 299-324.

‏

Schmitt, N., Gooding, R.Z., Noe, R.A. & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982

20.

and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37(3), 407-422.

‏

Terpstra, D.E. & Rozell, E.J. (1997). Why some potentially effective staffing practices are seldom used. Public Personnel

21.

Management, 26(4), 483-495.

‏

Weiss, M., Lotan, I., Kedar, H. & Ben‐Shakar, G. (1988). Selecting candidates for a medical school: An evaluation of a

22.

selection model based on cognitive and personality predictors. Medical Education, 22(6), 492-497.

‏

Ziegler, M., MacCann, C. & Roberts, R. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. Oxford

23.

University Press, USA.

‏