Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Next Page  48 / 68 Previous Page
Information
Show Menu
Next Page 48 / 68 Previous Page
Page Background

יולי 5102

- 48 -

מקורות

Ambady, N. & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-

1.

analysis. Psychological bulletin, 111(2), 256.

Barber, A.E., Hollenbeck, J.R., Tower, S.L. & Phillips, J.M. (1994). The effects of interview focus on recruitment effectiveness:

2.

A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 886.

Campion, M.A., Palmer, D.K. & Campion, J.E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology,

3.

‏.207-556 ,)3(05

Chapman, G.B. & Johnson, E.J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. Heuristics and

4.

biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 120-138.

Dana, J., Dawes, R. & Peterson, N. (2013). Belief in the unstructured interview: The persistence of an illusion. Judgment and

5.

Decision Making, 8(5), 512-520.

DeVaul, R.A., Jervey, F., Chappell, J.A., Caver, P., Short, B. & O’Keefe, S. (1987). Medical school performance of initially

6.

rejected students. JAMA, 257(1), 47-51.

Dipboye, R.L. (1997). Structured selection interviews: Why do they work? Why are they underutilized? In N. Anderson & P.

7.

Herriott (eds). International Handbook of Selection and Assessment. London: J Wiley, pp. 455-474.

Enright, M.K., & Gitomer, D. (1989). Toward a description of successful graduate students. ETS Research Report Series,

8.

1989(1), i-37.

Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational

9.

Psychology, 1(3), 333-342.

Huffcutt, A.I. & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.

10.

Hunter, J.E. &Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological bulletin, 96(1), 72.

11.

Judge, T.A., Cable, D.M., & Higgins, C.A. (2001). The employment interview: A review of recent research and recommendations

12.

for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 383-406.

King, D.W., Beehr, T.A. & King, L.A. (1986). Doctoral student selection in one professional psychology program. Journal of

13.

clinical psychology, 42(2), 399-407.

Kuncel, N.R., Hezlett, S.A., & Ones, D.S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate

14.

record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 162.

Lievens, F. & De Paepe, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of interviewer‐related factors that discourage the use of high

15.

structure interviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 29-46.

Owen, J. (2008). The nature of confirmatory strategies in the initial assessment process. Journal of Mental Health Counseling,

16.

30(4), 362-374.

Owen, J., Quirk, K. & Rodolfa, E. (2014). Selecting Graduate Students: Doctoral Program and Internship Admissions. The

17.

Oxford Handbook of Education and Training in Professional Psychology, 237.

Parmley, M.C. (2006). The effects of the confirmation bias on diagnostic decision making (Doctoral dissertation, Drexel

18.

University).

Salgado, J.F. & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview.

19.

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 299-324.

Schmitt, N., Gooding, R.Z., Noe, R.A. & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982

20.

and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37(3), 407-422.

Terpstra, D.E. & Rozell, E.J. (1997). Why some potentially effective staffing practices are seldom used. Public Personnel

21.

Management, 26(4), 483-495.

Weiss, M., Lotan, I., Kedar, H. & Ben‐Shakar, G. (1988). Selecting candidates for a medical school: An evaluation of a

22.

selection model based on cognitive and personality predictors. Medical Education, 22(6), 492-497.

Ziegler, M., MacCann, C. & Roberts, R. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. Oxford

23.

University Press, USA.